Home Page > Movies Index (w/mixed oldies) > > Movie Review

This Review Reveals Minor Details About the Plot.

Bases Loaded & Here Come da Judge

Moonlight Mile on IMDb

Plot Overview

a swing and hit
the missthe postmanPretty Bertie Knox (Ellen Pompeo) got knocked silly in a pickup base­ball game at local Rogers Field in Gloucester, Massachusetts. That started a relation­ship with the errant batter Calford McGinnis. She became his regular helper serving drinks at Cal's Place a down­town watering hole. When he got called away in the draft, circa 1968, she became its night manager. Her day job is, “I sling stamps down at the post office.” Cal has now—1972—been missing for three years, leaving her in limbo and “a source of entertainment” in the small town.

tombstoneOne of Bertie's customers is writer Jojo Floss (Susan Sarandon) whose husband Ben (Dustin Hoffman) works in commercial real estate. He has designs on Cal's Place as the linch­pin in a shop­ping mall scheme. He's invited his future son-in-law Joe Nast (Jake Gyllenhaal) to go into business with him, so Joe and his fiancée, Ben and Jojo's daughter Diana, move back to town to prepare for their June wedding and Joe for the new business. Diana tragically loses her life before the wedding. In order to intercept the now moot invitations, Joe goes down to the post office where he meets Bertie.

happy hugIn a town experiencing a “boy shortage,” one of Diana's friends (“The vultures have landed”) connives to take Joe to a bar where he ends up dancing with Bertie. They develop feelings for each other, but Joe's loyalty is to Ben and Jojo who aren't done processing their daughter's death, so he's inhibited from following through with Bertie as he would like. As if that weren't bad enough, in this time of a historical generation gap, Joe has some critical secret that he won't share with them, not until he's under oath in the trial of the accused killer. It's as described by author Ken Follett:

“The war taught me that nothing counts as much as loyalty.”

“Bullshit. You still haven't learned that when humans are under stress, we're all willing to lie.”

“Even to people we love?”

“We lie more to our loved ones, because we care about them so damn much. Why do you think we tell the truth to priests and shrinks and total strangers we meet on trains? It's because we don't love them, so we don't care what they think.” (225)

Ideology

Marriage
Counseling

The movie opens with Ben on the phone to the rabbi to make sure there's no mention of God in the service … or of Yahweh. On the way to the funeral, they pass a church whose sign reads: Gloucester Village Church. No mention of God there either. It's a safe bet that had there been a wedding, God would not be mentioned in it. It's probably cultural and Massa­chusetts being the strong­hold of the Puritans, this is likely their influence. According to cultural historian David Hackett Fischer the Puritans regarded marriage not as a sacred in­sti­tution, but rather as pro­viding a family con­text where its mem­bers could socially live out the grace of God. The Puritans had “a cultural idea of marriage that was unique to the Puritan colonies. … The Puritans of New England rejected all the Anglican ideas. They believed that marriage was not a religious but a civil contract” (77).

Let's compare that with what marriage has been from time immemorial. For a proper definition, I'll quote Dr. Ide: “The Con­tem­por­ary Christian stan­dard was defined not by the bible but gen­er­ated by Roman law as defined by the jurist Modes­tinus who argued that marriage was ‘consortium omnis vitae, divini et humani iuris communi­catio: a life-long part­ner­ship, and a sharing of civil and religious rights’” (83–5). Saint Augustine defined marriage as a domestic church, which is what Catholics still call matrimony in their catechism, and the Orthodox do too. Martin Luther who started Protestantism favored what he called a companionate marriage, which has caught on every­where but doesn't obviate the other. If the church tends to religious rights, the state regulates civil rights in the domestic sphere. The feminists just complain about a married woman being a domestic.

left handBertie was by no means married to Cal and nobody said any­thing to her about engagement. She's not sporting any “hardware,” i.e. rings. She's just been “helping out” at Cal's place. The feminists would call her a domestic.

The second victim—head wound—in the “family restaurant” shooting is the “wife” of a bloke who went off his meds and got a little trigger happy. The prosecutor called her his “common-law wife, concubine, what­ever.” In court the humble guy turns into a “loving husband.” The state gives more substance to their marriage than does Jesus who didn't recognize common-law marriage. (John 4:17-18) “The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband: For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.” Their marriage is but a domestic partnership.

Ben and Jojo's marriage is that and also a domestic church whether the rabbi mentioned Yahweh in their ceremony or not, as they've lived out the proper vows and had the proper witnesses from among their friends.

It was expected that Puritans would marry. The unwed determined to remain single were even compelled to live with families to keep them out of trouble. It should be no sur­prise then to see Joe welcomed to live with his once expected in-laws, though he being not from around there thought it “weird.”

loversur pupperAs for love every­body loved every­body else except for the prosecutor, of course. The couples in various kinds of “marriages” loved one another. The business partners loved each other but not the competition. Diane loved her dog Nixon “Nix” be he no Democrat. She loved song­birds, being a member of the Blue Jays. She loved her horse having won three awards in the Saddle & Bridle Club competitions. She loved her leather jacket that she wore every­where. The towns­folk loved the grieving parents a little too much.

Love is too amorphous to be used to define marriage, and in this movie even an ill defined engagement left the parties at sea. We are not told the judicial verdict but perhaps can take a clue else­where. Consulting scientist Marvin Harris on What is Marriage? we read:

One of the problems with the proposition that the nuclear family is the basic building block of all domestic groups is that it rests on the assumption that widely different forms of matings can be called “marriage.” Yet in order to cover the extra­ordinary diversity of mating behavior characteristic of the human species, the definition of marriage has to be made so broad as to be confusing. —

Since the term marriage is too useful to drop altogether, a more narrow definition seems appropriate: Marriage denotes the behavior, sentiments, and rules concerned with coresident hetero­sexual mating and reproduction in domestic contexts.

To avoid offending people by using marriage exclusively for coresident hetero­sexual domestic mates, a simple expedient is available. Let such other relation­ships be designated as “noncoresident marriages”, “man-man marriages”, “woman-woman marriages,” or by any other appropriate specific nomen­clature. It is clear that these matings have different ecological, demographic, economic, and ideological implications, so nothing is to be gained by arguing about whether they are “real” marriages. (317–18)

Production Values

” (2002) was written and directed by Brad Silberling. It stars Jake Gyllenhaal, Dustin Hoffman and Susan Sarandon. It also features Holly Hunter, Ellen Pompeo and Dabney Coleman. Hoffman offers a fresh take on a grieving family man trying to expand his horizons. Very satisfactory performances were given by most of the rest. Holly Hunter made a determined prosecutor out to make the best with what she's got. All the acting was quite good.

MPA rated it PG–13 for some sensuality and brief strong language. The location shots were limited but telling. The drama was focused and played to the point. It had great 70s rock music. Runtime is 1 hour 57 minutes.

Review Conclusion w/a Christian's Recommendation

There were no bedroom scenes except for Joe waking up from ghostly visitations. I don't suppose there was any talk of an after­life in a eulogy, not shown, and that left Jojo wondering where her daughter went. Under the ground as far as this movie is concerned. Social life in the village, bar scenes, and family gatherings got represented well enough to fill out the plot but not enough to make us care all that much. This would make a good movie to watch if you're thinking of moving to New England.

Movie Ratings

Action factor: A post office on a slow day. Suitability for Children: Suitable for children 13+ years with guidance. Special effects: Average special effects. Video Occasion: Good for a Rainy Day. Suspense: A few suspenseful moments. Overall movie rating: Three and a half stars out of five.

Works Cited

Scripture quoted from the King James Version. Pub. 1611, rev. 1769. Software.

Fischer, David Hackett. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford UP, 1989. Print, Web.

Follett, Ken. Code to Zero. Copyright © Ken Follett 2000. New York: from the Penguin Group, 2000. Print.

Harris, Marvin. CULTURE, PEOPLE, NATURE: An Introduction to General Anthropology fifth edition. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1988. Print.

Ide, Arthur Frederick. Noah & the Ark: The Influence of Sex, Homo­phobia and Hetero­sexism in the Flood Story and its Writing. Las Colinas: Monument Press, 1992. Print.