Movie Review - Bible Based: Win a Date with Tad Hamilton!

This Review Reveals Minor Details About the Plot.

Win-a-Date Girl

Plot Overview

Three bff since childhood work at the same supermarket in Frazier's Bottom, WVa. Rosalee Futch (Kate Bosworth) and Cathy Feely (Ginnifer Goodwin) do bagging & checking; Pete Monash (Topher Grace) is their good-natured manager. After work they go out for drinks at the Lil' Dickens, Rosalee beating Pete at darts after distracting him, winning the wager for beers. On the weekends it's the movies, chick flicks featuring Tad (Hollywood heartthrob) Hamilton (Josh Duhamel) playing the iconic boy next door. The opening scene shows him as a sharply dressed soldier playing opposite nurse Betty (Amy Smart) in a starched white uniform, white hat, white shoes.

They all three use the same employee break room and wear red on white uniforms. Pete's store mascot is a brown and white terrier. Rosalee chows down on her favorite Pringle: sour creme and onion. She is sweet (white) sugar and (white) spice. At home Pete squirts mayonnaise on a sandwich and Tad plops down on a white upholstered sofa. The girls have Pete wrapped around their little finger; he assigns them whatever days off or overtime they desire. Not so a black employee who doesn't get sick leave even though she's coughing.

This difference in the way the manager treats White and black employees has evidently come to the attention of the home office, for they send down a representative George Ruddy (Stephen Tobolowsky) who hands Pete a check for $125 and “another top manager of the month award” though he's running out of display room on the wall plastered with them. They will be losing him to Richmond where he's going to attend Virginia State. (Richmond, you know, was the capital of the Confederated States during the Civil War.)

Rosy is the lucky winner in an Internet contest for a date with Tad Hamilton. She arrives first class to a Hollywood teaming with pretty women come to get discovered but more often than not taking jobs in the service sector until their big break comes. Lots of black chicks do the same. Tad employs two immigrant maids.

photographer lovers rooster and chick After their dinner date—where he is careful not to be seen with brown liquor or cigarettes—and her intro to the swinging Hollywood scene, Tad returns her to the celebrity hotel her virtue intact. Being impressed with this wholesome blonde from the hinterland (“amber waves of grain”) he trails her back to West Virginie where he buys a farm and displays some down home skills he'd picked up on various sets. The cows yield copious amounts of white milk and his ax splits a log clean in two just as violence once split our nation.

money bags Before Tad can spirit Rosy back to Hollywood, Pete comes calling at her home to belatedly declare his love for her. It's too late, she's doing laundry for the trip and has a “load of whites” in the wash. Dejected, Pete leaves but encounters her sympathetic dad Henry Futch (Gary Cole) on the porch—Rosy lives with him. Mr. Futch considers Pete the better match for his daughter, and if life were fair, he says, that's who she would end up with, but life isn't always fair. “Sometimes Goliath kicks the sh!t out of David.” The agricultural South was defeated by an industrialized North that had an endless supply of troops to allocate, just as Tad loaded with money and time to spare between shoots could devote his disingenuous self to winning Rosy. Furthermore, the date-Tad contest ran concurrent with a save-the-children campaign. It was never stated what the children were to be saved from, but it doesn't take an Einstein to figure it was the yankees who sadly are not on the biblical side of history.

Ideology

plowing For those not settled in the sands of time, I offer this remedial history lesson, with apologies to those who don't need it. The Bible story is widely known of Adam & Eve's temptation and fall in the Garden of Eden, how the woman ate the forbidden fruit and gave it to her husband to eat (Gen. 3:6), God responding by increasing the severity of the woman's childbirth pains (Gen. 3:16) and making man's toil onerous (Gen. 3:17-19.) What is less well known—except in places like the Bible Belt—is a redo of sorts to ameliorate man's difficult labor. Noah's father Lamech had (Gen. 5:29) “called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.” Or from novelist Jess Shelton: “There's a place in the Book tells on Lamech. He got him a boy called Noah and he says: This boy'll bring us comfort from our work and from the toil of our hands in the ground the Lord cursed” (126). They still had to follow the earlier template to get a reprieve. Instead of the forbidden tree to be respected by the first couple, there was old man Noah whose work break was to be respected by his (Gen. 6:10) “three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.” They may be formed into two pairs: the eldest Japheth & Shem, and the youngest Ham paired with his own son Canaan making the numbers even. By way of analogy from a May Astor novel, we see “Walter Carewe & his enchanting Beatrice, who … bore him their three children: Virginia, Charles, born a year apart, … Elsie, two years younger. … Virginia and Charlie had been a unit within their family unit. Dad and Mum were a unit. Elsie was another unit, like a small soft bud attached to the Mum and Dad unit” (16–19). Noah fortified himself with wine before invoking blessings on his paired sons, as later would Isaac with savory venison before blessing Esau. In the Genesis account of the Flood, is a mystery woman, the mother of Ham. (Gen. 9:18-19) “And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.” Let's look again at Noah's story (Jasher 5:14-17):

“And the Lord said unto Noah, Take unto thee a wife, and beget children, for I have seen thee righteous before me in this generation. And thou shalt raise up seed, and thy children with thee, in the midst of the earth; and Noah went and took a wife, and he chose Naamah the daughter of Enoch, and she was five hundred and eighty years old. And Noah was four hundred and ninety-eight years old, when he took Naamah for a wife. And Naamah conceived and bare a son, and he called his name Japheth, saying, God has enlarged me in the earth; and she conceived again and bare a son, and he called his name Shem, saying, God has made me a remnant, to raise up seed in the midst of the earth.”

Shem and Japheth were full brothers, Ham was born at a later date (the youngest, see Gen. 9:24) perhaps from a different mother. Noah's wife was older than he was. Perhaps at 580+ years she was no longer able to bear children after the first two. She didn't have any more after the flood, even though it was a time to repopulate the earth. Maybe she stopped bearing before the flood. Ham could then have been stepbrother of the other two.

Researcher Mark DeWayne Combs posits that, “Although Jasher specifically references the births of Japheth and Shem, there is no such reference to the birth of Ham. … that Ham may have been much younger than his brothers and that he may have had a different mother” (389). Combs also observes, “Fathering a child, particularly a son, through a handmaiden or servant girl would not have been an uncommon or forbidden practice in that time period” (165). William Thackery's Victorian memoir relates, “I was an only child, though I was entranced to learn later in life that I also had a black half-sister, my father following local custom in India and having a native wife” (6). Historian Kenneth M. Stampp remarks that “Apologists for slavery traced the history of servitude back to the dawn of civilization and showed that it had always existed in some form until their own day” (14).

Come the deluge and the ark's passengers could well be a model for, (James 5:13) “Is any among you afflicted? let him pray. Is any merry? let him sing psalms.” There was undoubtedly a lot of distress on their voyage occasioning a lot of prayer, and their eventual landfall would have been accompanied by much celebration. As ordained minister Tom Dooley points out, “Such a long period of ark living must have been quite tiresome. No doubt Noah's family was thankful for their safety and provisions; however, one could imagine them becoming restless, ready to get their feet on dry land again” (59.)

When (Jasher 6:40-41) “they all went out from the ark, they went and returned every one to his way and to his place, and Noah and his sons dwelt in the land.” They'd been cooped up together long enough, so now they spread out somewhat according to some preestablished pecking order. God (Jasher 6:42) “said unto them, Be fruitful and fill all the earth; become strong.” To become strong meant, among other things, taking their needed meds when sick, along the lines of, (James 5:14) “Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord.” Children are always getting sick. Here it seemed to be Canaan's turn whose elders would have been his father Ham and grandfather Noah. Oil in Bible times was a medication, as the good Samaritan (Luke 10:34) “bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine,” and as Paul's instruction to Timothy to, (1Tim. 5:23) “Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.” Grapes grow in the summer, but once they're fermented, the wine can be stored throughout the year. Noah got into the store while setting an example for a work break, establishing period(s) of escape from hard work per Lamech's saying, now near universally observed, as author Ray Loriga notes: “Men, here and anywhere else in the world, tend to seek solace in beer at the end of a workday—” (179). Or in a Benjamin Black novel: ‘He nodded in the direction of a marble-fronted public house on the other side of the street. “That place looks cool enough, and we could do with something to sustain us.” ¶‘They crossed the road, dodging the traffic, and dived through the double swing doors into sanctuary, dim and tranquil. Quirke never ceased to marvel at the palatial grandeur of Dublin pubs’ (53). It's like the scene played out in WaDWTH! at a local bar with an ersatz rhino head—exotic animal—mounted on the wall. Authoress Marie Kay once described something similar:

“To become happy,” my father and grandfather had often told each other, “to make one forget, yes. That's what wine is for, but never to get one drunk. That is only for derelicts, not for men.” ¶… My grandmother often said, “Merry, yes. Highly merry, well, once in a while. Drunk, never. That's … not for us.” (157–8)

Yet there is the matter of bonding, as in a Hartzell Spence novel:

“Aw, come on,” they said. “You don't really know a fellow until you get tight with him.”
My observation told me this was true. The inseparable friendships in our house were drinking companionships. The great men were drinkers. A man was not quite a comrade, no matter what his attainments, until he had been on a binge. Once he had come in well oiled late at night and the fraternity had greeted his bleary eyes the next noon at lunch with the raucous song of brotherhood, he was one of them. The difference was subtle but it was there.

Only recently one of the bashful boys, who had been treated casually by the fraternity had come in drunk. The next noon every face at the dining table beamed, and every throat burst out with song:

Here's to Herbie, tried and true,
He's a Phi Psi through and through. (333)

Noah's drunken incident humanized him as a bona fide man of history with an extraordinary achievement, not merely a pious religious figure. It was also the occasion to sort out his sons' destinies for many generations to come.

In vino veritas. Looking forward from that point it might rate a line from a Greg Bear novel: “Dicken reached into the shopping bag and produced a bottle of merlot. ‘Zoo security could bust us,’ he said, ‘but this is the least of our sins. Some of what needs to be said may only be said if we're properly drunk.’” (235)

By chance or design this exceptional indulgence interfered—it had to inconvenience someone—with Ham's youngest son Canaan's need, and Ham could well have been the low-status brother from another mother.

Instead of the wily serpent we had Noah's wife as an on-the-spot agent, who since she isn't mentioned, did well incurring no rebuke. She would have made herself scarce giving Noah some space to relax when he started drinking. (1Tim. 2:9-10) “In like manner also, that women adorn themselves … with shamefastness and sobriety … (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.” Being a virtuous woman (Prov. 31:27) “She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.” She would not have let grass grow under her feet but would have gone straight to visit Ham to make adjustments regarding their diminished store of medicinal alcohol, like the homespun heroine in an Andrew Taylor novel:

Mrs Arabella was a woman of decision. Having made up her mind to do something, she did not postpone it and did not permit half-measures. The inoculation of the household was arranged the following day and put into practice on the day after. (175)

Ham showed up shortly at Noah's tent to check out the cause. He fell to temptation by mocking his dad to his two brothers, but they would have none of it. This is parallel to Eve earlier failing first then offering the forbidden fruit to Adam who accepted it, but here the older brothers did not go along with Ham, so we'd expect them to receive a blessing rather than a curse such as it was. The distribution of labor had to be readjusted to account for the new workers' holiday(s), and Ham for his insolence left himself and his family line open to taking up the slack.

The licensor's alternate image text explains Noah, “When he drank some of the wine, he got drunk and uncovered himself inside his tent. Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father's nakedness and told his two brothers who were outside. Shem and Japheth took a garment and placed it on their shoulders. Then they walked in backwards and covered up their father's nakedness. Their faces were turned the other way so they did not see their father's nakedness (Genesis 9:21-23).” They covered the old man to prevent him from catching a chill in the mountains as it was no longer summer. Ham's show of disrespect to their patriarch is like the treatment of a revered matriarch in a Seymour novel:

I don't think she'll be pleased to know that her picture is now a source of amusement throughout Naples. When she knows, and she soon will—it's inevitable—that her daughter … is in part responsible for her being photographed with bare thighs and most of her arse on display, I believe she'll feel resentful towards you. (131)

owl and eye Ham had put himself in jeopardy according to, (Prov. 30:17) “The eye that mocketh at his father, and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out, and the young eagles shall eat it.” Especially pertinent in this case is Noah's control over the animals including the raven (Gen. 8:7) and he is not unique, at least not in literature. Novelist Ted Bell writes of a chief inspector who “had been beaten to within an inch of his life and nearly pecked to death by countless killer ravens. All the while locked inside the cage of a Victorian aviary” (357.) There is even biblical precedent for it when some youths mocked a man of God for not having a covering of hair on his head and they got mauled by beasts. (2Kings 2:23-24) “And … as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.”

The man of God is a spiritual father and the carrion birds would get the leavings from the apex predator, along the lines of Thackeray's poem, Timbuctoo:

In Africa (a quarter of the world)
Men's skins are black, their hair is crisp and curled
And somewhere there unknown to public view
A mighty city lies called Timbuctoo
There stalks the tiger, there the lion roars
Who sometimes eats the luckless blackamoors
All that he leaves of them the monster throws
To jackal, vultures, dogs, cats, kites and crows (27)

eye trim There's a parity of eye loss and servitude given in (Exodus 21:26) “And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake.” Ham and his line—represented by Canaan in his lineage—could be given servitude rather than mutilation. This would be in keeping with the sentiment of Job in, (Job 31:7-8) “If my step hath turned out of the way, and mine heart walked after mine eyes, and if any blot hath cleaved to mine hands; Then let me sow, and let another eat; yea, let my offspring be rooted out.” In that picture above we see Ham after disregarding his mom's caution, checking up on his dad, getting carried away by an eyeful of the dishabille inebriate, and gesturing with his hands to his brothers. If he were to “sow, and another eat” and his “offspring be rooted out,” that would mean becoming a slave and his offspring being carried away in bondage. Perhaps Mrs. Noah persuaded (2Peter 2:5) “Noah a preacher of righteousness” to go easy on his son, as did a preacher's wife in a Jack Williamson novel:

“Down on your knees!” The preacher unbuckled his belt. “And beg the Lord's forgiveness—”

“Joseph!” His mother caught the preacher's arm. “For Jesus' sake, not today!” …

He never knelt. Before daylight next morning he took the preacher's wallet and the keys to the red Chevy pickup and drove west to try his luck in Las Vegas. Near Flagstaff, he ran off a curve and totalled the pickup. When the police brought him home, the preacher told them to take him on to the lockup where he belonged, but his mother begged till they agreed to drop the charges and send him to a military school. (22)

corporal punishment The Bible's account leans towards the military service option. (Gen. 9:24-27) “And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son [Ham] had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.” When Noah woke up, he blessed as a pair the lines of his two respectful sons and cursed Ham's line—pairing Ham with his youngest son Canaan as was Noah's wont to go by twos—giving them servitude to his other two sons'. (Jasher 73:35) “For the Lord our God gave Ham the son of Noah, and his children and all his seed, as slaves to the children of Shem and to the children of Japheth, and unto their seed after them for slaves, forever.” The two pairings reflect (Eccl. 4:9-10) “Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour. For if they fall, the one will lift up his fellow: but woe to him that is alone when he falleth; for he hath not another to help him up.” Japheth and Shem received a “good reward for their labor,” a blessing for covering up their dad with shamefastness; easier to do without looking if there are two of them to hold out the blanket. The punishment of Ham would have been disastrous for him had he not been paired with his son Canaan making a continued line of servitude rather than falling to the raptors. The youths mentioned above who mocked the man of God received the full impact of the malediction not having yet offspring to help bear the brunt of it.

Ham's youngest son Canaan is the particularly noted recipient of the punishment. Later when the Israelis invaded the promised land, the Canaanites were due for destruction, but the Gibeonite branch (the Hivites of Joshua 11:19 & Gen. 10:15-17) did a deal with Joshua who was the Jewish leader. They'd heard what happened to other Canaanite tribes, so they sent ambassadors dressed as if they'd come from a long journey (Joshua 9:3-6) and persuaded Joshua to make a league with this “distant” tribe. When it was discovered they'd tricked Joshua into sparing them, (Joshua 9:24-27) he made them bondmen, which was more to their liking. If this trick is indicative of the character of the original Canaan, he might well have been malingering to get out of his chores, which would also help explain Noah's hesitation to coddle him with wine. At any rate Noah deserved to relax with some of the wine store after his hard work.

More germane to modern times is perhaps the lineage of Cush, Ham's oldest son (Gen. 10:6,) Cush meaning black in Hebrew, having settled in Africa, some of his to become in later years African slaves. Researcher Bodie Hodge confirms that, “As a general trend, Ham is the father of many peoples in Africa” (122). Dr. Ide adds, “Ham sired four sons: Cush (translates as ‘black’) … and Canaan the youngest” (62). A description of their lot might be got from a 1924 Thomas Shastid Novel:

“the tumult which I heard as I came toward the shore!”
“A caravan of slaves,” replied the bishop. “Gone now. Driven through the village like cattle, they are on their way to a larger place south. There a great ship awaits them. It will take them over to islands in the west—to labor, to sorrow, to die.”

“But I thought such things had been banished by law.”

“Here, as in Starlight, laws are often broken.” (160–1)

reindeer “Driven through the village like cattle” curiously touches on birds' mutilation as in a Thames Williamson account of a migration: “as they went crowds of birds hovered over them, hawks and ravens and gulls, all feeding upon the lemmings” (46) according to some hierarchy and pecking order. In fact he even writes of a kind of double jeopardy: “fawn still raw on the shoulder where that eagle tore it … A monstrous raven has slipped down and is clinging to the fawn with the torn shoulder, plucking savagely at the wound” (8). The carrion birds customarily go first for the eyes of a corpse, “already the eagles have been there, and have plucked out its eyes” (57).

Lincoln's face The Proverb has “ravens of the valley pick[ing] it out” and “the young eagles eat[ing] it.” That speaks of geographical separation, the valley being distant down low and the aerie way up high where the eagles nest. The mama eagle, of course, transports the plucked eye to her chicks. She would represent the ships of the transatlantic slave trade, the ravens would be the native African slave hunters, and the “young eagles” would be the end user slave owners, the last stop for these Negro slaves. The American Civil War was less than successful in liberating them as Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation applied only to the states in rebellion not to the Union ones under his authority. It would take Congress to do that through Constitutional amendment requiring ratification by three fourths of the states by such and such a deadline, which they could not obtain except by occupation of some temperamental states, in which case their vote under duress wouldn't count. This is discussed in my reviews of “News of the World”, “On the Basis of Sex”, and “X.” The Negroes' influence in America until the 1930's is briefly described by novelist George S. Schuyler:

When one-third of the population of the erstwhile Confederacy had consisted of the much-maligned Sons of Ham, the blacks had really been of economic, social and psychological value to the section. Not only had they done the dirty work and laid the foundation of its wealth, but they had served as a convenient red herring for the upper classes when the white proletariat grew restive under exploitation. The presence of the Negro as an under class had also made of Dixie a unique part of the United States. There, despite the trend to industrialization, life was a little different, a little pleasanter, a little softer. There was contrast and variety, which was rare in a nation where standardization had progressed to such an extent that a traveler didn't know what town he was in until someone informed him. The South had always been identified with the Negro, and vice versa, and its most pleasant memories treasured in song and story, were built around this pariah class.

The deep concern of the Southern Caucasians with chivalry, the protection of white womanhood, the exaggerated development of race pride and the studied arrogance of even the poorest half-starved white peon, were all due to the presence of the black man. Booted and starved by their industrial and agricultural feudal lords, the white masses derived their only satisfaction and happiness from the fact that they were the same color as their oppressors and consequently better than the mudsill blacks. (141–2)

In 1960 author Caskie Stinnett wrote, “Did you ever hear of the Freedman's Bureau? Well, it was set up right after the Civil War to help freed slaves get established. I'm not positive but I believe somewhere in this labyrinth of marble there's a small unit of the Freedman's Bureau still working away. I don't know what it does—maybe nothing. But it's there” (113). If Noah's pronouncement settled generational servitude on Ham's line, then Thomas Jefferson's Declaration graced the Negroes with unending bureaucratic emancipation.

Production Values

happy
hug “” (2004) was directed by Robert Luketic. It was written by Victor Levin. It stars Topher Grace, Josh Duhamel, Kate Bosworth, Nathan Lane, and Gary Cole. Kate Bosworth is impossibly cheery, but then she plays a girl not jaded by city life. Topher Grace playing a geeky good guy evokes sympathy throughout. Josh Duhamel as an overextended Hollywood star has his best scene with nurse Betty in the opening scene, in a movie within a movie. Don't arrive late and miss it.

MPAA rated it PG–13 for sexual content, some drug references and language. It was filmed in Frazier's Bottom, West Virginia, USA. Runtime is 1 hour 35 minutes.

Review Conclusion w/a Christian's Recommendation

This is a movie not a church service, but as a movie it's Christian friendly. Sin is portrayed just enough to get the picture—as necessary for the plot. The virgin keeps her virtue more through interruption than caution—young people take note. Source of goodness is from church attendance and Tad favors the Mexican (Catholic) maid over the Albanian (atheist.)

This is really a well-worn plot, no surprise there. Hollywood is contrasted with a Podunk town as expected, the eye-opener being a Southern perspective on the whole thing. Yet there were no Confederate flags flying, none that I saw, although they wouldn't have clashed with the story. There is shown an American flag flying at the father's home of the contest winner when she arrives at the end of the day to a media feeding frenzy. They're supposed to be lowered at night unless lighted. It's a minor show of disrespect.

The cast and crew had a good go at it, wry humor was sprinkled throughout, and the writer was clever at times. If you like this kind of thing, you should be satisfied.

Movie Ratings

Action factor: A little reckless driving. Suitability for Children: Suitable for children 13+ years with guidance. Special effects: Average special effects. Video Occasion: Good for groups favoring a female perspective. Suspense: Keeps you on the edge of your seat. Overall movie rating: Four stars out of five.

Works Cited

Unless otherwise stated, scripture is quoted from the King James Version. Pub. 1611, rev. 1769, 1873. Print. Software.

Drunken Noah scene depicted in a Civil War vintage woodcut, made after a drawing by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld (German painter, 1794–1872) from his archive, published in 1877, and more recently by iStock.com/Getty Images. Used under license.

The Book of Jasher. Translated from the Hebrew into English (1840). Photo lithographic reprint of exact edition published by J.H. Parry & Co., Salt Lake City: 1887. Muskogee, OK: Artisan Pub., 1988. Print, Web.

Combs, Mark DeWayne. End the Beginning. USA: Splinter in the Mind's Eye Pub., 2014. Print.

Hodge, Bodie. Tower of Babel: The Cultural History of Our Ancestors. Green Forest, AR: New Leaf Pub., 2013. Print.

Ide, Arthur Frederick. Noah & the Ark: The Influence of Sex, Homophobia and Heterosexism in the Flood Story and its Writing. Las Colinas: Monument Press, 1992. Print.

Schuyler, George S. Black No More. Copyright, 1931, by The Macaulay Company. Reprint by College Park, Maryland: McGrath Publishing Company, 1969. Print.

Shastid M.D., LL.B. Sc.D. etc, Thomas Hall. Who Shall Command Thy Heart? Copyright 1924 in the United States of America by Thomas Hall Shastid. Publisher to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan: George Wahr, 1924. Print.

Spence, Hartzell. Get Thee Behind Me. Copyright, 1942, by Hartzell Spence. New York: Gosset & Dunlap Publishers. Print.

Stampp, Kenneth M., Professor of American History at the University of California (Berkeley).
The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South. Vintage Books, 1955. Print.

Movie: Win a Date with Tad Hamilton!

Bible Based Review